مروری بر فناوری های غشایی در حال ظهور و پیشرفته برای تصفیه پساب
محورهای موضوعی : پليمرها و نانوفناوری
فرزاد مهرجو
1
(دانشگاه بیرجند)
محمدصابر باغخانی پور
2
(گروه شيمي)
امیر علم
3
(تهران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت، مرکز پژوهش و فناوری علم و توسعه)
کلید واژه: فرایند زیستی, زیست¬راکتور غشایی, فناوری غشا, تصفیه پساب,
چکیده مقاله :
در طی سال‌ها، فرایندهای متداول تصفیه پساب تا حدودی در تصفیه پساب‌ها برای نقاط تخلیه موفق بوده‌اند. توسعه در فرایندهای تصفیه پساب برای قابل استفاده کردن مجدد پساب تصفیه شده در مصارف صنعتی، کشاورزی و خانگی ضروری بوده است. فناوری غشایی به عنوان فناوری ایده آل برای تصفیه پساب و جریان های مختلف پساب ظهور کرده است. فناوری غشایی یکی از به‌روزترین پیشرفت‌هایی است که در کاهش بنیادی ناخالصی‌ها به سطوح موردنظر موفق بوده است. علی رغم داشتن موانع خاص، زیست راکتورهای غشایی (Membrane Bioreactors) برای تصفیه زیستی پساب مزایای زیادی نسبت به تصفیه معمولی دارند. این مقاله مروری تمام جنبه‌های فناوری غشایی را که به طور گسترده در فرایندهای تصفیه پساب مورداستفاده قرار گرفته را بررسی کرده است. از جمله جنبه های اصل فناوری غشا، طبقه‌بندی فرایندهای فناوری غشایی مطابق با فشار، غلظت، الکتریکی و حرارتی، کاربرد آن در فرایندهای مختلف صنایع، مزایا، معایب و آینده نگر را پوشش داده است.
Over the years, conventional wastewater treatment processes have achieved to some extent in treating effluents for discharge pints. Development in wastewater treatment processes is essential to make treated wastewater reusable for industrial, agricultural, and domestic purposes. Membrane technology has emerged as an ideal technology for treating wastewater from different wastewater streams. Membrane technology is one of the most up‐to‐date advancements discovered to be successful in fundamentally lessening impurities to desired levels. In spite of having certain impediments, membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for biological wastewater treatment provide many advantages over conventional treatment. This review article covers all the aspects of membrane technology that are widely used in wastewater treatment process such as the principle of membrane technology, the classification of membrane technology processes in accordance to pressure, concentration, electrical and thermal‐driven processes, its application in different industries, advantages, disadvantages and the future prospective. Over the years, conventional wastewater treatment processes have achieved to some extent in treating effluents for discharge pints. Development in wastewater treatment processes is essential to make treated wastewater reusable for industrial, agricultural, and domestic purposes. Membrane technology has emerged as an ideal technology for treating wastewater from different wastewater streams. Membrane technology is one of the most up‐to‐date advancements discovered to be successful in fundamentally lessening impurities to desired levels. In spite of having certain impediments, membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for biological wastewater treatment provide many advantages over conventional treatment.
1. Kaushik G., Bioremediation of Industrial Effluents: Distillery Effluent in Applied Environmental Biotechnology Present Scenario and Future Trends, India: Springer, 1-167, 2015.
2. Bharagava R.N., Chowdhary P., Emerging and Ecofriendly Approaches for Waste Management, Singapore: Springer, 1-435, 2019.
3. Sen T.K., Review on Dye Removal from Its Aqueous Solution into Alternative Cost Effective and Non‐Conventional Adsorbents, Journal of Chemical Process Engineering, 1-11, 2014.
4. Fritzmann C., Lowenberg J., Wintgens T., Melin T., State of The Art of Reverse Osmosis Desalination, Desalination, 216, 1–76, 2007.
5. Sonune A., Ghate R., Developments in Wastewater Treatment Methods, Desalination, 167, 55-63, 2004.
6. de Gisi S., Notarnicola M., Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. 1 Ohio, United States: Elsevier, 23-42, 2017.
7. Ezugbe E.O., Rathilal S., Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review, Membranes (Basel), 10, 89, 2020.
8. Radjenovic J., Petrovic M., Barcelo D., Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) As an Advanced Wastewater Treatment Technology Cytotreat View Project SEA‐On‐A‐CHIP View Project, Article Handbook Environmental Chemistry, 5, 37-101, 2008.
9. Gitis V., Hankins N., Water Treatment Chemicals: Trends and Challenges, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 25, 34-38, 2018.
10. Bolong N., Ismail A.F., Salim M.R., Matsuura T., A Review of The Effects of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater and Options for Their Removal, Desalination, 239, 229-246, 2009.
11. Mulligan C.N., Yong R.N., Gibbs B.F., Surfactant‐Enhanced Remediation of Contaminated Soil: A Review, Engineering Geology, 60, 371-380, 2001.
12. Ahmadian M., Ravanchi M.T., Kaghazchi T., Kargari A., Application of Membrane Separation Processes in Petrochemical Industry: A Review, Desalination, 235, 199-244, 2009.
13. Abedini R., Nezhadmoghadam A., Application of Membrane in Gas Separation Processes: Its Suitability and Mechanisms. Petroleum and Coal, 52, 69-80, 2010.
14. Ghaly A.E., Ananthashankar R., Alhattab M.V., Ramakrishnan V.V., Production, Characterization and Treatment of Textile Effluents: A Critical Review, Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology, 5, 1-18, 2013.
15. Ismail A.F., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T., Reverse Osmosis, Reverse Osmosis, 227, 395-405, 2018.
16. Singh G., Kumar Bulasara V., Preparation of Low‐Cost Microfiltration Membranes from Fly Ash, Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, 1204-1212, 2015.
17. Kazemimoghadam M., Mohammadi T., Chemical Cleaning of Ultrafiltration Membranes in The Milk Industry, Desalination, 204, 213-218, 2007.
18. Waite T., Fane A., Schafer A., Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications, Journal American Water Works Association, 1, 1-560, 2005.
19. Srinivasan A., Ahilan B., Divya C.M., Divya M., Aanand S., Srinivasan A., et al, Bioremediation an Ecofriendly Tool for Effluent Treatment: A Review, International Journal of Applied Research, 1, 530-537, 2015.
20. Elimelech M., Mi B., Organic Fouling of Forward Osmosis Membranes: Fouling Reversibility and Cleaning Without Chemical Reagents, Journal of Membrane Science, 348, 337-345, 2010.
21. Peters T., Membrane Technology for Water Treatment, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 33, 1233-1240, 2010.
22. Jyoti J., Alka D., Jitendra., Kumar S., Application of Membrane Bioreactor in Wastewater Treatment: A Review, International Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 3, 155-122, 2013.
23. Magara Y., Kunikane S, Advanced Membrane Technology for Application to Water Treatment, Water Science and Technology, 37, 91-99, 1998.
24. Collivignarelli M.C., Abba A., Carnevale Miino M., Damiani S., Treatments for Color Removal from Wastewater: State of The Art, Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 727-745, 2019.
25. Ahmad A., Mohammad‐Setapar S.H., Chuong C.S., Khatoon A., Wani V.A., Kumar R., et al., Recent Advances in New Generation Dye Removal Technologies: Novel Search for Approaches to Reprocess Wastewater, RSC Advances, 21, 182-188, 2015.
26. Koc‐Jurczyk J., Removal of Refractory Pollutants from Landfill Leachate Using Two‐Phase System, Water Environment Research, 86, 74-80, 2014.
27. Pavithra K.G., Sentil Kumar P., Jaikumar V., Sundar Rajan P., Removal of Colorants from Wastewater: A Review on Sources and Treatment Strategies, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 75, 1-19, 2019.
28. Zoubeik M., Ismail M., Salama A., Henni A., New Developments in Membrane Technologies Used in The Treatment of Produced Water: A Review, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43, 2093-2118, 2018.
29. Jefferson B., Bixio D., Membrane Bioreactor Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, Desalination, 187, 271-282, 2006.
30. Chang I.S., Le Clech P., Jefferson B., Judd S., Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128, 1018-1029, 2002.
31. Valladares Linares R., Fortunato L., Farhat N.M., Bucs S.S., Staal M., Fridjonsson E.O., et al., Mini-Review: Novel Non-Destructive in Situ Biofilm Characterization Techniques in Membrane Systems, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 22894-22901, 2016.
32. Babuponnusami A., Muthukumar K., A Review on Fenton and Improvements to The Fenton Process for Wastewater Treatment, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2, 557-572, 2014.
33. Gao W., Liang H., Ma J., Han M., Chen Z., Han Z., et al., Membrane Fouling Control in Ultrafiltration Technology for Drinking Water Production: A Review, Desalination, 272, 1-8, 2011.
34. Qu F., Liang H., Zhou J., Nan J., Shao S., Zhang J., et al., Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling Caused by Extracellular Organic Matter (EOM) From Microcystis Aeruginosa: Effects of Membrane Pore Size and Surface Hydrophobicity, Journal of Membrane Science, 449, 58-66, 2014.
35. Wang N., Li X., Yang Y., Zhou Z., Shang Y., Zhuang X., Photocatalysis‐Coagulation to Control Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling Caused by Natural Organic Matter, Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121790, 2020.
36. Wang H., Park M., Liang H., Wu S., Lopez I.J., Ji W., et al., Reducing Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling During Potable Water Reuse Using Pre‐Ozonation, Water Research, 125, 42-51, 2017.
37. Liao Y., Bokhary A., Maleki E., Liao B., A Review of Membrane Fouling and Its Control in Algal‐Related Membrane Processes, Bioresource Technology, 264, 343-358, 2018.
38. Liu T., Drews A., Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors‐Characterizations, Contradictions, Cause and Cures, Journal of Membrane Science, 363, 1-28, 2010.
39. Hilal N., Ogunbiyi O.O., Miles N.J., Nigmatullin R., Methods Employed for Control of Fouling in MF and UF Membranes: A Comprehensive Review, Separation Science and Technology, 40, 1957-2005, 2005.
40. Vrouwenvelder J.S., van Paassen J.A.M., Wessels L.P., van Dam A.F., Bakker S.M., The Membrane Fouling Simulator: A Practical Tool for Fouling Prediction and Control, Journal of Membrane Science, 281, 316-324, 2006.
41. Iorhemen O.T., Hamza R.A., Tay J.H., Membrane Fouling Control in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) Using Granular Materials, Bioresource Technology, 240, 9-24, 2017.
42. Peng N., Widjojo N., Sukitpaneenit P., Teoh M.M., Lipscomb G.G., Chung T.S., et al., Evolution of Polymeric Hollow Fibers as Sustainable Technologies: Past, Present, and Future, Progress in Polymer Science, 37, 1401-1424, 2012.
43. Mishima I., Nakajima J., Control of Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactor Process by Coagulant Addition, Water Science and Technology, 59, 1255-1262, 2009.
44. Bagheri M., Akbari A., Mirbagheri S.A., Advanced Control of Membrane Fouling in Filtration Systems Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: A Critical Review, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 123, 229-252, 2019.
45. Ahmad A., Mohd‐Setapar S.H., Chuong C.S., Khatoon A., Wani W.A., Kumar R., et al., Recent Advances in New Generation Dye Removal Technologies: Novel Search for Approaches to Reprocess Wastewater, RSC Advances, 5, 30801-30818, 2015.
46. Kimura K., Oki Y., Efficient Control of Membrane Fouling in MF by Removal of Biopolymers: Comparison of Various Pretreatments, Water Research, 115, 172-179, 2017.
47. Togo N., Nakagawa K., Shintani T., Yoshioka T., Takahashi T., Kamio E., et al., Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis Utilizing Hollow Fiber Membrane Module for Concentration Process, ACS Publications, 58, 6721-6729, 2019.
48. Mbakop S., Nthunya L.N., Onyango M.S., Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Nanocellulose Functionalized–Hybrid Membranes and Application in Water Quality Improvement, Processes, 9, 611, 2021.
49. Bouhid de Aguiar I., Schroen K., Microfluidics Used as A Tool to Understand and Optimize Membrane Filtration Processes, Membranes, 10, 316, 2020.